
I do not go for abstraction but can only paint what I see, and what I see is fascinating. Do you not think the swirls of nature in the roots of trees is a work of beauty? Or the wind-blown wheat in the field?
You say the lamp is clear and distinct, but you must be seeing it wrong, for there is an aura of light, a halo of being, around it.
And the stars in the sky, what wonders these points of light echoing through space! The morning star on the horizon is almost as bright as the moon!
***
Vincent van Gogh was against abstraction and painted from nature. His sketchbook is full of fascinating drawings that people of his day thought boring. All of the points on his famous painting “Starry Night” can be identified, from Venus on the horizon to the constellation Aries. The moon was gibbous on the night represented, but he abstracted it for the composition. One thing, though – there are a lot of people who think Vincent had Cataracts or another eye ailment that caused him to see halos around bright objects since he always painted them with halos. It isn’t uncommon, so there is a very strong possibility…
***
Word count = 100
Friday Fictioneers is hosted by Rochelle Wisoff-Fields. This week’s prompt is here and uses a photo © Dale Rogerson . Read more or join in by following the InLinkz “linky“.
Pingback: 75 – Night – Beach Walk Reflections: Thoughts from thinking while walking
Fascinating, now I am wondering if Vincent Van Gogh had a form of vision dyslexia
LikeLike
Every one sees the same picture, but not the same world.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Exactly, and nobody saw quite like Vincent…
LikeLiked by 1 person
How interesting. I’d never thought of this. Funny how one reality can be so different from another.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think artists often see the world in a different way than most people, but it is possible some really see it different! I don’t think there is any proof van Gogh had any issues with his vision, but it is an interesting theory.
LikeLike
This was very nicely done! Here’s to the images we see, and the images we think we see, and the reality of both.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks! To the art of seeing! May others see and capture the beauty of the ordinary as well as Vincent.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Amen to that! I have a print of one of his paintings (a poster from the Metropolitan Museum of Art from years and years ago), in my apartment. Love the colors. Love the ‘mood’.
LikeLiked by 1 person
There is something about the colors and moods in his paintings that are just so immediate, like he painted just a few minuets ago, just for you…
LikeLiked by 1 person
True! He didn’t hold back in his paintings, all out with color and mood.
LikeLiked by 1 person
A lovely meditation.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks.
LikeLiked by 1 person
What beautiful poetic prose!
The art of seeing… Now there’s a thought to dwell on.
LikeLike
Thanks! I once read that if you can write legibly that you have the muscle control to draw like Leonardo, the rest is seeing and understanding what you see, and, wow, could van Gogh see!
LikeLike
Even before I saw your note, I thought of Van Gogh. Such an artist. Tragic life. I can envision just how he would paint this scene… how each stroke would fall onto the canvas with its own light. Ahhhh, this was a great write this week. Love where it took my thoughts.
LikeLike
Thanks, Bear. Glad my words could turn your thoughts to such great beauty as van Gogh’s paintings :)
LikeLiked by 1 person
Lovely post Trent 💜💜💜
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, Willow!
LikeLike
A pleasure Trent 💜
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nice prose fiction, Trent. He may have been against abstraction but he may have, like you said, been in appreciation of the holiness of nature and so imbued it with a glow.
LikeLike
Thanks. I read that he used to have heated arguments with Gauguin about painting what you see vs abstraction. I recently saw a movie, At Eternity’s Gate, that did a great job showing it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I saw that movie and loved it. Have you seen the one where they bring his paintings to life?
LikeLiked by 1 person
I haven’t seen that one yet, but it has been on my list since the first preview came out. I know you are a film buff, so not surprised that you saw both of them.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I saw the first one because I wanted to see Dafoe as VanGogh, and the 2nd one because I knew it would be magical.
LikeLiked by 1 person
And Dafoe did a great job!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Having just been through the removal of cataracts, I have complete sympathy with the idea that Van Gogh had them :)
I really enjoyed this piece, as “Starry Night” is a favorite of mine. It hasn’t always been. It sort of grew on me over the years, and now I see, perhaps, more clearly through the artist’s eyes. Thanks for a most interesting post.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ah, so you have first hand experience of the effect. Glad that in the modern age we can take care of them. I half ignored the painting until I visited the MoMA in NYC and saw it in person. I didn’t know it was there until I saw it. It was one of the few paintings I have seen that literally took my breath away. Now it, and most of van Gogh’s paintings are near the top of my list.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I would love to see it in person. I just don’t want to go to NYC to make it happen :)
LikeLiked by 1 person
Quite a few van Gogh’s have visited Boston, but I don’t think they ever let that one travel…
LikeLiked by 1 person
What a lovely write, Trent. Thanks to Rochelle, now I have the song in my head!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, Dale. lol, so do I ;) Funny, I almost titled the story “Starry, Starry Night” because that song had pushed that title so deep into my mind when I was a kid!
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s sunny because someone posted that song last week for her father and I’ve had it in a dn out of my head since!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Make that FUNNY
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sunny, funny? All the same ;)
LikeLiked by 1 person
😁
LikeLiked by 1 person
lol, now that is funny! Isn’t it odd when a song you haven’t heard in decades suddenly pops up everywhere?
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s true!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
A true artist sees more in everything that we do, be it actual or imaginary. A great take Trent.
LikeLiked by 1 person
A big part of art is the art of seeing. Thanks.
LikeLiked by 1 person
There’s more to seeing than meets the eyeball, indeed
LikeLiked by 1 person
Much more, and the art of drawing is more the art of seeing than the art of moving a brush.
LikeLike
Dear Trent,
Written like an artist. And I mean that in the best way. Of course now I hear Don McClean singing “Starry starry night…” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oxHnRfhDmrk
Shalom,
Rochelle
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, Rochelle. Most of the visual arts is learning to see… I haven’t heard that song in ages. It is a great song, and I love that video with all of the paintings
LikeLike
A fascinating insight. Starry Night hangs on my living room wall!
LikeLiked by 1 person
It is a gorgeous painting – I saw the real thing once. It is one of those paintings that looks great in reproduction, but is totally jaw-dropping in person.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It would be interesting to see the world like this, I think. The lightning is stunning in this pic.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Have you ever had your eyes dilated by an Optometrist? It isn’t the same, but you see star-bursts around everything as well as halos. Very cool, but I don’t knwo if I’d want to go through life that way! And the halo effect is also a sign of cataracts.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ok, I retract my words, cataracts not good 😀. What you described sounds like the strobing light effect I’ve had a couple of time. Disco in the eyes. Weird experience that. I heard its the start of a migraine but it never developed into that.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I once asked my doctor about the flashing I have occasionally gotten through life and he told me that it was a migraine, but I never had the headache part… Dilated pupils is different. If you’ve seen a photo where light source has beams, like a child’s drawing of a star, that is it.
LikeLiked by 1 person