He’s the only one who gave us good information during the chaos.
Don’t matter one iota.
He did a lot of public projects that helped millions.
So, you are excusing his behavior? Justifying it?
Of course not. I’m saying that the good work still exists even if performed by a monster. Think of Wagner’s music and…
…and it is still the music of a monster, just as all of his “public projects” are just that, so much “public defecation”. He’s a politician…
But what about your guy?
He’s a businessman, not a politician.
Now there’s your manure…
word count = 100
(Trent, stay out of politics!!!!) There is a big name (which will remain nameless ;) ) that is once again in the news. Yesterday someone I know said something along the lines of how good they thought some of the things he did back when he did them, but now that they know what type of a man he is, it is obvious that those works are actually awful. This person isn’t a fan of the businessman, but I have heard people use that argument…. Anyway, fiction, fiction, fiction, not my opinion!! ;)